A New Tort of Intimate Partner Violence: What You Need to Know

Family breakdown is often accompanied by difficult and emotional circumstances. In some cases, those circumstances include intimate partner violence. A recent decision from the Supreme Court of Canada has changed how the law addresses that harm by recognizing a new civil claim: the tort of intimate partner violence.

This development has important implications for family law cases, particularly where one party has experienced a pattern of abuse during the relationship.

Here are six things you need to know about this new tort:

  1. The Supreme Court of Canada has officially recognized a new tort of intimate partner violence. The recent decision of Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2026 SCC 16, determined that individuals can pursue damages for intimate partner violence through a distinct civil claim. This tort addresses patterns of abuse within a relationship, including coercion and control, rather than focusing only on isolated incidents.[1]
  2. The new tort includes coercive control, not just physical violence. The decision recognizes a broad range of behaviours within intimate partner violence, including emotional abuse, financial control, isolation, intimidation, and sexual coercion.[2]
  3. A claim requires proof of three key elements centred on the relationship and the conduct.[3] A claimant must establish:

  1. that the conduct occurred in an intimate relationship or its aftermath;
  2. that it was intentional; and
  3. that it objectively amounts to coercive control.

Once established, the harm is recognized without needing separate proof of physical or psychological injury.[4]

  1. Existing tort claims were found to be inadequate to address this type of harm.[5] Traditional claims like assault or intentional infliction of emotional distress are often insufficient in capturing the cumulative and ongoing nature of coercive control, as they tend to focus on specific incidents rather than the broader pattern of abuse.[6]
  2. The law now recognizes loss of dignity, autonomy, and equality as compensable harm. Intimate partner violence is not limited to physical or emotional injury, but includes the broader loss of freedom and independence within the relationship.[7]
  1. It remains an open question whether claims for intimate partner violence can be brought within family law proceedings or if they need to be brought by way of a separate claim. Current case law authority suggests that such claims will generally need to be commenced separately by way of a statement of claim, with the possibility of later consolidation with any pre-existing family law proceedings. However, given the developing nature of this area following Ahluwalia, the exact procedural approach is not yet fully determined.

[1] Ahluwalia v Ahluwalia, 2026 SCC 16 at para 8 [Ahluwalia].

[2] Ahluwalia at paras 5, 7, 12-14.

[3] Ahluwalia at para 5.

[4] Ahluwalia at paras 5, 184.

[5] Ahluwalia at paras 6, 12.

[6] Ahluwalia at para 12.

[7] Ahluwalia at paras 8, 12, 17.

This article is intended to provide legal information only, not legal advice. It is recommended that you seek the advice of a lawyer to understand your rights and options.

For further information, please contact:

Curtis P. Clavelle
Direct: 306-933-1341
Email: [email protected]

Written with the assistance of Sarah Grieve, Summer Student

Related News and Articles

Privacy of Intimate Images in a Digital Age

Privacy of Intimate Images and Videos in a Digital Age By Sean Sinclair of Robertson Stromberg LLP   The online distribution of intimate images and videos (often referred to as “revenge porn”) is a growing problem in Canada.  According to the RCMP, as outlined in...

read more

Good Faith in Contract Law

Good Faith in Contract Law By Jared D. Epp, Robertson Stromberg LLP Although no one on a construction project would argue that good faith is not important, what it means to act in good faith can mean different things to different people. The concept of good faith can...

read more

Holding Taxpayers at Ransom

James Steele's article on the latest target of data bank robbers - Canadian municipalities - appears in the August 2019 issue of Canadian Underwriter.  James speaks anecdotally of Canadian municipalities who have been hijacked by cyber criminals and advises municipal...

read more

Kusch and Clavelle Contribute to CBA BarNotes

The most recent issue of the Canadian Bar Associations's BarNotes contains articles by two RS lawyers. Travis Kusch's article “Closely Held Corporations: Avoiding the Messy Break-up”  offers practical advice to families who enter into business together. Curtis...

read more

Why Courts Show Deference to Consultants’ Decisions

by Misty Alexandre Robertson Stromberg LLP Like the onus carried by the proverbial middle child, the Consultant is bound to wear the unbiased hat of fairness as they administer the typical construction contract. Perhaps this is why the Courts have consistently paid...

read more

Q&A: Hurt in a Car-Accident and someone needs to pay!

Question: I have been in a car accident and suffered an injury. Can I sue the other driver?Answer: Saskatchewan is often referred to as a no-fault insurance jurisdiction. The reality is more nuanced. In Saskatchewan, you can elect to either have no-fault insurance or...

read more
Share This
Articles & ResearchA New Tort of Intimate Partner Violence: What You Need to Know